Thursday, August 5, 2010

Craig Ranke, Enver Masud on Truth Jihad Radio

Truth Jihad Radio Sat. 8/7/10, 5-7 pm Central, American Freedom Radio (archived here.) Call-in number: (402) 237-2525 or (402) AFR-252, or post your questions to my Facebook page.

First hour: Craig Ranke of Citizen Investigation Team (CIT), makers of the documentary National Security Alert, will discuss the CIT tour of Europe scheduled around this upcoming 9/11 anniversary. Craig will also discuss 911blogger's bizarre decision to censor Barrie Zwicker's ringing endorsement of CIT.

Barrie Zwicker: "The evidence now shows, well past reasonable doubt, what happened. It was detonation of explosives within the building, timed to coincide with a flyover by a large jet plane, thus producing the clever illusion that flight 77 crashed into the Pentagon, heart of the official 9/11 Pentagon lie . . . To add insult to insult, the same perpetrators have assigned disinformation specialists to attack the honest citizen detectives of CIT. This suggests, to me at least, that hidden behind and within the dark and treasonous false flag deception carried out at the Pentagon on 9/11 are even darker secrets. To me, two most important questions now, almost nine years after the events, urgently call out for investigation. First, who are those behind the vicious attempts to discredit the work of the Citizen Investigation Team? Second, what are the motives of the would-be discreditors and those behind them? I say 'attempts' because careful examination of the arguments CIT’s tormentors show them to be tricky and unreliable -- as flimsy as the official story they try to defend."

Speaking of the would-be discreditors, 9/11 sex stalker Brian "The Axis of" Good has made CIT one of his prime targets for disruption and cyber-stalking. The Axis of Good has also targeted Carol Brouillet, William Rodriguez, and me. (I suppose Barrie Zwicker is next.) I can't think of a greater badge of honor than to be singled out along with these courageous and talented truth-seekers.

Second hour: Enver Masud of The Wisdom Fund (twf.org), board member of Muslims for 9/11 Truth and author of the terrific new essay Fear Paralyzes US Muslim "Leaders". We will be discussing our progress awakening the Islamic community to 9/11 truth, and how to counter the septic tidal wave of Islamophobia washing over the former USA.

Note: Enver Masud will be appearing at The Truth Gathering in the Catskills of New York State next week, August 14th-16th along with Richard Gage, Luke Rudkowski, Barry Kissin, Nick Bryant, Paul Zarembka, Rev. Ian Alterman, and Raphael Diaz, and of course the organizer, Sander Hicks. Directions. Schedule. Next week's show will include a live update from participants.

8 comments:

  1. Kevin,

    Please have Craig Ranke and Enver Masud read these two articles. These articles provide very strong evidence that a plane hit the Pentagon.

    It was probably the actual scheduled plane although there is information that suggests the Mossad could have used a substitute plane.

    These articles from whatreallyhappened.com are the best articles I have read on the subject. People should focus on the Mossad and their traitors in the US government and not on the notion that a plane did not strike the Pentagon.

    1.The Pod People And The Plane That Crashed Into the Pen http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/ppfinal.html?q=ppfinal.html

    2. 9/11 Pentagon Eyewitness Accounts http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/911_pentagon_eyewitnesses.html?q=911_pentagon_eyewitnesses.html

    ReplyDelete
  2. I've read these -- long ago actually. The best Pentagon researchers are Barbara Honegger and CIT. Read their stuff very carefully.

    Most students of 9/11, including the most thoughtful (DRG being #1) agree that not only did no big plane hit, but that the falsity of the official story of the Pentagon attack is at least as obvious as, say, the falsity of the official story about WTC-7. The difference is that WTC-7 is a better sound-bite for newbies.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Well I agree with Mike Rivero that indeed a big plane hit the Pentagon. He makes a very strong case in both of the articles. I don’t believe all of those eyewitnesses could have been wrong. He gives a great explanation on why it was indeed a large plane.

    I also agree with him that the no big plane theory is a distraction to divert attention away from the obvious masterminds the Mossad and place it on Bush and Cheney.

    Besides, why go to all the trouble and complicate things by dumping the plane in the ocean and hit the Pentagon with a missile that didn’t really do much damage or a small plane that would have been seen by numerous witnesses. Using a missile or a small plane would attract to much suspicion.

    I will read Barbara Honegger and CIT information on the Pentagon attack.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think both you and Ranke need a lesson from Michael Ruppert.
    I don't agree with everything Ruppert has done or said.
    But he has an excellent point: Also start with a quote from your enemy.
    People won't believe what your enemies have done until
    they hear it from the horses mouth, because it's so toxic, it seems impossible.

    In this case, the 9 - 1 1 report ADMITS that the 7 5 7 hit the p e n t a g o n
    at 550 mph, flying 5 feet above the ground.
    If that's not absurd on the face of it, I don't know what is.

    There are many similar examples.
    My point: start with the obvious.
    ONLY THEN go to technical validation and proof.

    Ranke's work is most commendable, but it needs the catalyst of prima facie obviousness.

    ReplyDelete
  5. brian good acted as a cop when we organized the private persons arrest of giuliani in san jose

    a very crafty cop i thought at the time

    mostly tried to lead me down ridiculous and counter-revolutionary rabbit holes

    a true fuck

    ReplyDelete
  6. Before listening to Craig Ranke's interview today I highly recommend you view his 81 minute presentation National Security Alert:
    http://www.citizeninvestigationteam.com/nsa.html

    There is no way you can still think the plane hit after viewing those witness interviews.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I have a thought that has bothered me ever since 9/11. I know there was an attempt to hire a private detective pursuant to those events, and he was pressured to back away. Curious, when the state contends 19 Arab youth attacked the United States all by themselves. Anyway, regarding the Pentagon flight, since this is a smoking gun, how difficult would it be to monitor Ted Olson's activities? It seems only reasonable that he would be contacting Barbara, assuming she is still alive, once the heat calmed down. The other obvious procedure, in my mind, is to approach various individuals about taking a polygraph test. Assuming they have nothing to hide, why would they object?

    ReplyDelete
  8. The commercial at the beginning of your show it started off with something about the Oil Spill. I don't know if you are aware but the Gulf Oil Spill was done on purpose!! Yes another False Flag Operation! There was a movie out in 2009 with Nicholas Cage, "Knowing", (on Youtube) where it shows a Gulf Oil Spill! Halliburton had the contract for the clean up before the oil spill!! Halliburton got their crew out before it blew and none of their people were injured!!

    I knew people who did that for a living that worked for Shell out of Houston that would worked on the Louisana oil rigs and if they wanted to they could cap that oil gusher off anytime!! They do it with underwater explosives. Think about it, they have been doing off shoring drilling for a long time. I believe this False Flag Operation that has to do with the Global Environmental so called problem! I think it is to help convince people that we need this Cap & Trade Tax that will tax the hell out of us that is in Congress right now!! People are so misinformed that they will happily go along with this Global Warming Clean Up BS!!

    ReplyDelete