Thursday, June 18, 2015

Libertarian Lindgren vs. progressive Reuschlein: Debating the presidential race

Broadcast June 19th, 10-11:00 a.m. Central (1500 GMT) on NoLiesRadio.orgFor only $3.95 a month you can listen to shows on-demand before they are broadcast - and also get free downloads and other perks from Kevin! If you are a subscriber, just log in to the members area of TruthJihad.com to get early access to the shows. Non-subscribers only get access to the No Lies Radio show archives the day after the broadcast here. Help Kevin keep these shows on the air - become a subscriber today!

Rolf Lindgren
With Rand Paul pushing to release the 28 pages and bust Jeb Bush for 9/11, it's a good time to break down the 2016 presidential horse race.

First half hour: Libertarian activist Rolf Lindgren predicts Martin O'Malley will win the Democratic nomination…and optimistically argues that Rand Paul has as good a shot as anyone at the Republican nomination. Rolf thinks Hillary Clinton and Jeb Bush are going down in flames. (Figuratively, I mean - the NWO obviously has no reason to crash THEIR planes.)

Second half hour: Progressive activist and peace economist Bob Reuschlein begs to differ. He thinks Hillary has the best shot to be the next president…but would like to see Rand Paul win - and then dismantle the US empire, close all of our 800+ military bases around the world, slash military spending to the bone, and revive the moribund economy.
"Dr. Peace" a.k.a. Bob Reuschlein

2 comments:

  1. Kevin,

    How would you feel if our next POTUS was a Jew? Looks like they are setting us up for the eventuality.

    B’Man’s 2016 POTUS Watch: Bernie Sanders Wins By Not Giving Oral Sex To A Donkey

    https://buelahman.wordpress.com/2015/06/08/bmans-2016-potus-watch-bernie-sanders-wins-by-not-giving-oral-sex-to-a-donkey/

    ReplyDelete
  2. Why has the TPP, etc., not been hacked?!

    I mean they have hacked about everything else, there must be so many copies in countries with far less security all over the pacific and people with info an this thing.

    I am not advocating the breaking of any laws. I am supporting the constitution – democracy cannot function in secrecy!

    If anything I have said might be interpreted as illegal, please ignore.

    jimmy

    ReplyDelete