Ian Greenhalgh of Veterans Today has just published his "Las Vegas Massacre Analysis." He exposes the lack of a real investigation and speculates on possible multiple-shooter locations. (It's obvious that one guy with a bump stock didn't kill 58 people and injure 546, especially when audio analysis proves multiple gunmen and belt-fed machine gun fire). In this interview Ian goes further, arguing that the Las Vegas massacre was one of a long series of covert operations ultimately directed by international bankers to divide and conquer their opposition and build increasingly centralized global power. He argues that while there may have been crisis actors involved, and a degree of stage management, there were also very real shooters killing and injuring people. This is the "hybrid event" model according to which the perpetrators of some false flags mix theatrical effects with real violence in order to confuse and disorient the public, discredit independent investigators, and avoid exposure. (This interview features a spirited discussion of gun control, which Ian tends to support.)
So who is right about the Las Vegas massacre? Listen and decide for yourself.