tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2253633813431459343.post1294337544532372504..comments2023-05-24T11:49:42.337-07:00Comments on Kevin Barrett's radio show schedule: Pearl Harbor Day Special! Thomas Kimmel on the KB Show, ONE HOUR EARLY!Kevin Barretthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11522769898898884227noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2253633813431459343.post-26684780678795954472010-12-08T18:12:05.771-08:002010-12-08T18:12:05.771-08:00Webster Tarpley sent me an email headed "Stin...Webster Tarpley sent me an email headed "Stinnett copies Hitler's view of FDR: 'provocateur,' sole cause of WWII." The body of the message contained an extract from Germany’s Declaration of War Against the United States<br />Hitler’s Reichstag Speech of December 11, 1941.<br /><br />My response:<br /><br />If WWI and WWII were two phases of the same war, it seems to me that the British were the real aggressors (since the 1914-1945 war was incited to preserve the world domination of the Anglosphere and the financiers who own it). Could it be that Hitler is telling more truth in this speech than FDR and Churchill ever told? Can you deny that Roosevelt was basically lying the whole time he was pretending he wanted to stay out of the war -- while in this speech Hitler is basically telling the truth about FDR's lies? Isn't it way past time to re-think the official mythology of the Anglo-Jewish war to pre-emptively smash Germany that we falsely divide into two "world wars"? Maybe this, like most other conflicts, was not one in which one side -- the stronger side that won and got to write history -- had a monopoly on virtue?<br /><br />Webster, I think your admiration for FDR has forced you into a position of cognitive dissonance. Your defense of FDR on the Pearl Harbor issue boils down to "he didn't do it -- and it's a good thing he did it!"<br /><br />KevinKevin Barretthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11522769898898884227noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2253633813431459343.post-20140846465533893612010-12-08T06:03:39.077-08:002010-12-08T06:03:39.077-08:00Well, 9/11 WAS a new Pearl Harbor cause they set t...Well, 9/11 WAS a new Pearl Harbor cause they set that one up as well.<br /><br />Archive of this program is here<br />http://noliesradio.org/archives/26277<br />(Below, purple high-light is mine)<br />I'll listen to it hopefully tomorrow.<br /><br />We went to watch Harry Potter, only to see another Illuminati sign,<br />Eye of Horus in a pyramid as expected...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2253633813431459343.post-38785096132315727312010-12-07T12:54:23.025-08:002010-12-07T12:54:23.025-08:00I'm always interested in hearing Tarpley's...I'm always interested in hearing Tarpley's take - he's brilliant, eloquent, erudite, and calls it like he sees it. That said, I still find Stinnett's arguments and evidence persuasive. Tarpley did not address most of the specific evidence cited by Stinnett. Instead, he argued that FDR was right in trying to bring the US into the war against the wishes of the American people, AND that specific foreknowledge of Pearl Harbor was hidden from FDR by the British and their agents/sympathizers in the US military. In other words, Tarpley seemed so suggest that FDR would have been right to provoke and allow Pearl Harbor if that was the only way to get the US into the war; but that he didn't do so because the Brits hid the intelligence from him. To judge the specifics of that argument, I'll have to read Rusbridger and Nave's "Betrayal at Pearl Harbor" etc. Based on what I know now, Stinnett's case is convincing.Kevin Barretthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11522769898898884227noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2253633813431459343.post-81973578068035192212010-12-07T11:23:14.446-08:002010-12-07T11:23:14.446-08:00Tarpley blew the "FDR is a traitor revisionis...Tarpley blew the "FDR is a traitor revisionist history" right out of the water!<br />Thanks for having him on. That you let him have his say speaks highly of your journalistic integrity.teouihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15497132662232687690noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2253633813431459343.post-25581066149168561922010-12-07T06:15:20.185-08:002010-12-07T06:15:20.185-08:00Hi Kevin – great stuff!
Also note that Huey L...Hi Kevin – great stuff!<br /><br /> Also note that Huey Long (the awesome American populist hero) would surely have been president, instead of Roosevelt, and would surely have kept the US out of WWII, if he had not been assassinated by a Zionist.<br /><br /> Also note that Howard Armstrong, another awesome American patriot and hero, and the inventor of FM radio, was hounded to death and probably murdered, as he tried to keep radio the truly public and democratic medium it was supposed to be. David Sarnoff, head of RCA, was a Zionist prodigy, well-placed to manipulate and blackmail Guglielgo Marconi. With the help of Congress, RCA turned radio into a monopoly – just prior to WWII.<br /><br /> If you’re interested in more information about the Zionist role in creating WWII, study the life stories of Huey Long and Howard Armstrong.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2253633813431459343.post-5404193760050004292010-12-07T06:04:40.888-08:002010-12-07T06:04:40.888-08:00Every possible angle?
Pearl Harbor deception has ...Every possible angle?<br /><br />Pearl Harbor deception has been proved seven ways from Sunday. Even mainstream historians are converting in droves. Read Stinnett.<br /><br />And the Pearl Harbor deception was the model for 9/11. They even worked very hard to make sure they'd kill roughly the same number of people. See Barbara Honegger's work on the order to close off access to the Towers' roofs and call off helicopter rescue operations. http://truthjihad.blogspot.com/2010/11/barbara-honeggers-brand-new-updated.html<br /><br />The Pearl Harbor model is THE central angle for an honest historical account of 9/11.<br /><br />KevinKevin Barretthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11522769898898884227noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2253633813431459343.post-70911843366697770552010-12-07T06:02:07.420-08:002010-12-07T06:02:07.420-08:00Mr. Barrett,
I gotta tell ya, you are starting to ...Mr. Barrett,<br />I gotta tell ya, you are starting to lose me here. <br />You are in danger of fading into the background and becoming a Cassandra. May I suggest that, instead of trying to prove ALL of your theories, you first establish some credibility with those who would otherwise be unwilling to listen to what you have to say and then take them progressively through the worldview that you are trying to disseminate?<br />If you continue to approach this issue from every possible angle, I fear that you are doing a disservice to the cause of getting people to realize that things aren't all that they seem.<br />sincerely,<br />JTAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2253633813431459343.post-45813662836260037882010-12-07T05:49:56.285-08:002010-12-07T05:49:56.285-08:00> The truth is fully-documented in Robert Stinn...> The truth is fully-documented in Robert Stinnett's Day of Deceit: <br /><br />As Aussies say, GOOD ON YOU(or rather, GOOD ON 'YA)!! Kevin.<br /><br />You know what?<br />Tojo who was executed by the US as War Criminal #1 apparently said before his death something like, "I was responsible domestically(like towards Japanese people, making them endure the war and horrible state of lives etc I think) but I am not against outside world." I think he meant that he did what he had to?<br /><br />Along with some campaign started by the U$A(not your US) after the war to make Japanese believe the JP military was the cause of all the tragedy incl Hiroshima/Nagasaki. <br /><br />Again, as usual, there is/are some agents among those who talk about that campaign, but I believe it did affect the majority of Japanese way of thinking and seeing things - brainwashing! Agents are trying to make Japanese see it so that they'd want to have a real military(which we already have, though) so that we can have wars... but I believe we need to take a look at the history with correct information/facts, and then beat the Illuminati who planned all these wars for their personal gain.<br /><br />Anyhow, BEST OF LUCK for this show! <br />I'll try and listen to its archive... could you send me the link later? ;o)<br /><br />Also, can you ever have Helen Thomas on your show?<br />I think she's genuine.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2253633813431459343.post-72546395726458946652010-12-06T19:42:18.238-08:002010-12-06T19:42:18.238-08:00aZOOGA! Ga-ZOOGA!
I used to go whole Hog on Day o...aZOOGA! Ga-ZOOGA!<br /><br />I used to go whole Hog on Day of Deceit as if it were the 5th Gospel.<br /><br />My revisionist history got even more revised when I spent time looking at Tarpley's revised revision of Pearl Harbor, which posits a Churchill-allied cabal above and behind Roosevelt, which maneuvered the attack on Pearl Harbor to draw the US into Britain's shooting war -- and thereby help weaken the US navy while also defeating the Germans. <br /><br />Stimson & George Marshall called out.<br /><br />Roosevelt thus becomes the "mark" -- the target, the dupe, of the conspiracy. Still, the attack fulfils the False Flag / LIHOP paradigm. <br /><br />"Let's you and he fight" -- Empire ain't dumb.<br /><br />http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJZrUCKK3QMAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com