tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2253633813431459343.post6996616587578691009..comments2023-05-24T11:49:42.337-07:00Comments on Kevin Barrett's radio show schedule: Ted Walter: For high-rise safety's sake, investigate WTC-7!Kevin Barretthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11522769898898884227noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2253633813431459343.post-87006898737954524532014-03-16T05:43:21.781-07:002014-03-16T05:43:21.781-07:00Good point.
What is previously unknown is the bea...Good point.<br /><br />What is previously unknown is the beams dislodging and buildings falling down from it.<br /><br />Expressing these things always involves a trade-off between economy and precision.<br />Kevin Barretthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11522769898898884227noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2253633813431459343.post-4457982981105562402014-03-16T05:42:46.816-07:002014-03-16T05:42:46.816-07:00I have followed your work on 9/11 truth and you co...I have followed your work on 9/11 truth and you come across to me as a person who is sincere and extremely well-informed on this issue.<br /> <br />I am writing just to bring your attention to a small point with regard to your article. It is something that was also noted by someone else in the comments section.<br /> <br />You refer to “thermal expansion” as a previously unknown phenomenon. Obviously, thermal expansion is not an unknown phenomenon and is something that does in fact occur to metal when heated. I fully agree with you that the official explanation for the destruction of the twin towers and WTC 7 is preposterous and that thermal expansion could not possibly account for the destruction of WTC 7, but I think that you should perhaps be more precise on this point so as to not give your critics any ammunition they can use to attack you.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2253633813431459343.post-6262755038687204172014-03-13T09:06:35.840-07:002014-03-13T09:06:35.840-07:00I don't trust or like Dr. Fetzer's diversi...I don't trust or like Dr. Fetzer's diversions and derision of nano thermate in the 911 dust.<br /><br />Our friend Chomsky states the best gambit for winning a hopeless debate is to "change the subject and then you win." <br /><br />“Physical evidence cannot be wrong; it cannot perjure itself; it cannot be wholly absent. Only its interpretation can err.” (Paul Kirk, Crime Investigation) <br /><br />Nanothermate is in the dust. The tone of the article by Professor Hightower with Dr. Fetzer riding shotgun for this hit piece reeks of derision and diversion.<br /><br />Nanothermate is in the dust. It should not be there. This one unimpeachable fact alone is enough evidence to indict the U.S. government for treason. <br /><br />Instead we get from Dr. Fetzer is what Cass Sunstein advocates; namely cognitive infiltration/dissidence. The goal of which is to divide the movement into internal squabbling.<br /><br />I got a great analogy of this. The autopsy finds a bullet in the heart of a victim with his head severed from the neck. Fetzer would argue, the bullet didn't kill the victim. It can't account for the head being missing.<br /><br />I don't trust Dr. Fetzer at all. Watch your six. <br /><br />I trust you.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com