Thursday, June 18, 2015

Libertarian Lindgren vs. progressive Reuschlein: Debating the presidential race

Broadcast June 19th, 10-11:00 a.m. Central (1500 GMT) on NoLiesRadio.orgFor only $3.95 a month you can listen to shows on-demand before they are broadcast - and also get free downloads and other perks from Kevin! If you are a subscriber, just log in to the members area of to get early access to the shows. Non-subscribers only get access to the No Lies Radio show archives the day after the broadcast here. Help Kevin keep these shows on the air - become a subscriber today!

Rolf Lindgren
With Rand Paul pushing to release the 28 pages and bust Jeb Bush for 9/11, it's a good time to break down the 2016 presidential horse race.

First half hour: Libertarian activist Rolf Lindgren predicts Martin O'Malley will win the Democratic nomination…and optimistically argues that Rand Paul has as good a shot as anyone at the Republican nomination. Rolf thinks Hillary Clinton and Jeb Bush are going down in flames. (Figuratively, I mean - the NWO obviously has no reason to crash THEIR planes.)

Second half hour: Progressive activist and peace economist Bob Reuschlein begs to differ. He thinks Hillary has the best shot to be the next president…but would like to see Rand Paul win - and then dismantle the US empire, close all of our 800+ military bases around the world, slash military spending to the bone, and revive the moribund economy.
"Dr. Peace" a.k.a. Bob Reuschlein


  1. Kevin,

    How would you feel if our next POTUS was a Jew? Looks like they are setting us up for the eventuality.

    B’Man’s 2016 POTUS Watch: Bernie Sanders Wins By Not Giving Oral Sex To A Donkey

  2. Why has the TPP, etc., not been hacked?!

    I mean they have hacked about everything else, there must be so many copies in countries with far less security all over the pacific and people with info an this thing.

    I am not advocating the breaking of any laws. I am supporting the constitution – democracy cannot function in secrecy!

    If anything I have said might be interpreted as illegal, please ignore.