tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2253633813431459343.post2422167125821191965..comments2023-05-24T11:49:42.337-07:00Comments on Kevin Barrett's radio show schedule: Geo-engineering special: What the bleep are they doing to our planet?Kevin Barretthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11522769898898884227noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2253633813431459343.post-17820239073263722652012-08-30T06:25:36.883-07:002012-08-30T06:25:36.883-07:00Re: http://www.americanfreedomradio.com/archive/Tr...Re: http://www.americanfreedomradio.com/archive/Truth-Jihad-32k-082412.mp3 If anything, alumina is a fire retardant; not an accelerant. Michael Murphy's chemical inaccuracies are very distracting. Nano-thermite isn't necessary to account for Professor Jones' findings of microscopic iron balls in WTC dust. Iron alloy in aluminum can render it extremely brittle, allowing facile fine powdering. Finely powdered aluminum increases the power of conventional high explosives, so long as there is sufficient oxygen to burn it. (Balance to CO rather than CO2.) Should that aluminum contain iron, it will form minute iron balls in the explosive residue. Since grinding chemically pure aluminum is dangerous and expensive, I would expect the alloy to be used. (A neighbor, the late Bill Shewfelt, ran IRECO Chemicals' ball mill and told me about it.) I would suggest downplaying the suggestions nano-thermite was used in the WTC demolition as it's ineffective, unnecessary, and overly expensive. When you hear hoof beats, think horses before zebras. Bad as fluoride alone may be, it also ferries aluminum across the blood-brain barrier. (I'd expect it to also increase absorption of aluminum from the gut.) The combination (fluoride and nano-alumina) is far worse, and probably causes much brain damage and inhibition. Remember the Maine! Where Maine goes, the nation goes.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com