tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2253633813431459343.post7654157941926606341..comments2023-05-24T11:49:42.337-07:00Comments on Kevin Barrett's radio show schedule: Paleocons on parade! Rev. Ted Pike, Martin Hill diversify Truth Jihad RadioKevin Barretthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11522769898898884227noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2253633813431459343.post-56673272726754161472012-11-13T18:31:16.664-08:002012-11-13T18:31:16.664-08:00Enjoyed both hours, thanks all. And Kevin, Tehran ...Enjoyed both hours, thanks all. And Kevin, Tehran times picked up your "Obama should bust Nutty for 911" article,<br />http://www.tehrantimes.com/component/content/article/84-perspectives/103287-now-its-payback-time-why-obama-should-bust-netanyahu-for-911<br /><br />Re the first segment with Ted Pike, and the brief discussion where you two disagreed over how benign, or not, the teachings of the Talmud are: I posted this to the Alan Hart show blog last month, and was disappointed when it went unanswered. Pasting here, hoping for some clarity,<br /><br /><i>Hi Kevin, I've heard you a few times now minimize the "toxic Talmud" as just a bunch of rabbis arguing, some of them crazy. Here's a Rense page which purports to provide (eng. translated) "quotes" of the Talmud's more toxic "teachings",<br />http://www.rense.com/general79/talmud.htm<br /><br />So, speaking as someone who's never read the Talmud, and I'll specify the "Babylonian Talmud" coz I understand there's at least one other major version, and I also note, since I understand the "original" is in Hebrew, we're reliant upon "translations", with all the possibility for "mistakes" and/or knowing deception that suggests...<br /><br />SO, the question is: in this text of "Rabbis (some crazy!) arguing with each other", does it take the form of "statement > response/agreement/objection/etc > rebuttal > rebuttal-to-rebuttal..." etc, you get the idea, ??<br /><br />IOW, are the socially-toxic statements we often see "quoted" as in the Rense page above, specifically & explicitly refuted elsewhere by other Rabbis, with then perhaps the original rebutting again, etc? </i>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2253633813431459343.post-34540840121554485352012-11-12T21:40:29.119-08:002012-11-12T21:40:29.119-08:00Hi Kevin, haven't heard this show yet so no co...Hi Kevin, haven't heard this show yet so no comment, and no need to post this publicly unless you want, IE you think it's relevant to this show. I just know this will interest you, but don't have an email for you.<br /><br />You might know of Veronica Clarke, young WW2 revisionist researcher- Spingola's had her on numerous times, and recently Kyle Hunt had her on:<br />http://grizzom.blogspot.com/2012/11/star-theory-radio-with-kyle-hunt.html<br />she comes on 20-some mins into that ^.<br /><br />Very end of that show she drops a bit of a bombshell WRT how the West can best take things back from the zio's. She says, convert to Islam en masse!<br /><br />So you'll see that sparked a bunch of comments at grizzcom, a couple from me, starting with comment #2 (Anon @ 7:26 AM). <br /><br />Veronica put up another audio today, a solo, responding specifically to those grizzcom comments, and spends the first half or so talking about the problem with Christianity & why Islam provides some answers. She claims no religious affiliation currently.<br /><br />I also replied where I pointed to a recent Mark Glenn comment, see <br />http://theuglytruth.wordpress.com/2012/10/25/rebel-catholic-group-expels-holocaust-denying-bishop<br />Glenn's reply to comment #10- namely he agrees that Christianity can't pull us out of this NWO quicksand.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com